Skip to main content

The Man Who Squeezes Muscles: Searching for Purple Aki

The Man Who Squeezes Muscles: Searching for Purple Aki is a short documentary on BBC Three that was first shown on 12th September 2016. The documentary shows a hunt for the infamous and mysterious Akinwale Arobieke, also known as Purple Aki (BBC, 2016).

The programme opens with presenter narrating as he walks through a poorly lit underpass. This choice of opening location creates enigma and sets the tone of the programme to be an insightful investigation into the "urban legend" (Nissim, 2016). Through the mise-en-scene of graffiti, litter dirt and it all looking very urban it creates the feel of a rough environment for the viewer and sets up what they see and the tone for the rest of the documentary.

This documentary "resonates with young people" (BBC, n.d.) as said in BBC Three's commissioning guide because it tackles a subject that "[stimulates] strong emotion and [provokes] reactions" due to Purple Aki being "somewhere between myth and reality" (Varley, 2017) for many youngsters in Liverpool. This is illustrated by the presenter saying "watch our or Purple Aki will get you" (Hattenstone & Allison, 2016)


When creating content thinking about the 5 W's and one H helps to create a compelling and fully rounded story, especially with factual programmes (Porter, 2010). Who: Benjamin Zand presents the documentary about Purple Aki and meets some of his victims/family of victims. What: An inside look into who Akiwale Arobieke is and his encounters with young boys, touching their muscles. Where: the documentary takes place in Merseyside. When: both day and night in the present day. Why: To bring to light and explain the mystery surrounding Purple Aki. How: by talking to victims, people who have seen him and friends/family of victims, the audience is given a wider picture of who he is and what he is really like.

In conclusion, I think that this programme was successful due to the enigmas it creates from the offset and the topic it covers. I didn't know about Purple Aki up until now and it's interesting to see and hear about myths and legends that are created by people in local areas.

Reference list

BBC. (2016). The Man Who Squeezes Muscles: Searching for Purple Aki. Retrieved 8 February 2018, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p0472z6v/the-man-who-squeezes-muscles-searching-for-purple-aki 

BBC. (n.d.). Documentaries on BBC Three. Retrieved 8 February 2018, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/tv/articles/documentaries-bbc-three

Hattenstone, S. & Allison, E. (2016, 21 October). Bodybuilder's race hate claim against BBC investigated by police. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/oct/21/bodybuilder-purple-aki-race-hate-claim-bbc-investigated 

Nissim, M. (2016). Purple Aki has a new BBC Three documentary film and you can watch it right now. Retrieved 8 February 2018, from http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/news/a807635/purple-aki-has-a-new-bbc-three-documentary-film-and-you-can-watch-it-right-now/ 

Porter, J. (2010). Five Ws and One H: The Secret to Complete News Stories. Retrieved 8 February 2018, from http://blog.journalistics.com/2010/five-ws-one-h/

Varley, C. (2017). IMHO: Should we laugh at urban legend Purple Aki -the man who squeezes muscles?. Retrieved 8 February 2018, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/9e756e96-30e8-4822-9e69-ff8271f689b6 

Popular posts from this blog

The Archers

The Archers is BBC Radio 4's "longest running drama" (Independent, 2011) and has been providing entertainment of real stories for over 67 years. It fits the radio 4 remit by providing a "wide range of other speech output including drama" (BBC Trust, 2016) but why has it been running for so long and what makes this drama engaging for its listeners? The episode I listened to was from back in 2013 when Bridge Farm's dairy herd was sold. This programme was grounded in factual research to ensure the programme sounded realistic for the viewers. The writer for The Archers visited a farm's cattle sale because there is "no way a writer could conjure scenes like this out of the imagination" (Solazzo, 2013). This quote shows that in every detail of the programme, in-depth research has been done to immerse the audience in as much realism as possible. The Archers covers a wide range of topics from "domestic violence and dementia to robotic cow mil

Desert Island Discs

This week I am focussing on copyright and clearance, more specifically how copyrighted material is cleared and what has been used in the chosen programme. I listened to the episode featuring Jack Whitehall which was broadcast on 9th February 2018. Desert Island Discs is presented by Kirsty Young who "invites her quests to share the soundtrack of their lives" (BBC, n.d.) and broadcast on BBC Radio 4. Desert Island Discs fits BBC Radio 4's remit because the "mixed speech service" (BBC, 2016) is used to "inform, educate and entertain" (BBC, 2016) its audience. The Copyright,  Designs and Pattern Act 1988 is the law on copyright currently in the UK (UKCS, n.d.). It gives the creator of original content control over how their content is used. It is described as when an "individual or organisation creates a work, and applies to a work if it is regarded as original" (UKCS, n.d.) then copyright arises. For Desert Island Discs, the music used w

Eden: Paradise Lost

Eden: Paradise Lost - Channel 4 'Eden: Paradise Lost' was first broadcast as 'Eden' on Channel 4 in 2016. The programme followed the experience of a group of men and women from the UK as they "face the challenge of building a new life and creating a new society from scratch" (Channel4.com, 2015). Using an "embedded crew" (Channel4.com, 2015) the group have only the basics to survive and build a new society but after the only a few episodes being aired in 2016 it was "pulled from screens" (Swindon, 2017) and in 2017 it was rebranded as 'Eden: Paradise Lost' to "tell the story of how it all fell apart so dramatically" (Nicholson, 2017). When the participants emerged from Eden, they realised that it "had not been on television in months" (Nicholson, 2017) mainly due to the ratings falling "from 1.7 million to 800,000 over four episodes" (Swindon, 2017). So why did this programme fail? The five new e